World News: Military Leaders Claim Full legislative authority in Egypt

Egypt's  Revolution has encountered a major setback

Violence from Egyptian Revolt

Egypt's Supreme Constitutional Court ruled the country's parliament invalid today. This marks what could be the end of Egypt's brave attempt at democracy. The fate of the countries future rests in the hands of the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces. The Supreme Council, under the leadership of Mohamed Hussein Tantawi, will be calling a 100 person assembly that will write the country's new constituion.




              Today we will be turning the Eye of the internet towards Egypt, but first I need to bring any readers who have not been following this story up to speed; On January 25th 2011 Egyptian citizens took to the streets to protest against the rule of President Hosni Mubarak. The protest turned violent the day after. As the movement grew the protests grew more violent and by January 31th there were well over 250,000 protesters in Tahnir Square demonstrating against Mubarak. The Egyptian military soon adopted a neutral stance in the conflict, siding neither with the government or the protesters. After continued protest and violence Mubarak surrendered his power to the Supreme Council of Egyptian Armed Forces on Friday February 11th 2011, this day became know as "Friday of Departure".
           In the following months the original constitution and parliament were dissolved, elections were held, and a new parliament was formed to draft a new constitution. The region was still very unstable, many protesters were not happy with the new ways either.  However, Egypt's Constitutional Court ruled the new parliament invalid today.
          But why was the parliament dissolved? Well the court found that the parliamentary election methods were invalid. This means that the ballots cast were not properly counted and or the methods of election were generally "unfair". This left Egypt without a parliament, which is why the Supreme Council of Armed Forces (SCAF) took over and promised a new constitution quickly. This has outraged members of the Muslim Brotherhood (Egypts largest Islamist party) they are calling it a "military coup". They believe SCAF is operating against the very democracy they promised to help create. It seems that the chances for a democratic government for Egypt are slipping away. After more than a year of death and destruction, the Egyptians may be right back where they started. The military has lifted the bans that stopped members of Mubarak's regime from running for election. Egypt could very possibly see the old regime return. When asked about it protesters stated. "We'd be outraged, if we weren't so exhausted." That seems to be a strong sentiment coming from the revolutionaries, and if this is true how much longer can they hold on?
         So what do you think? Has all the violence been for naught? Or will the military establish fair election procedures and bring the return of the democracy? Let us know in a comment down below.

-HowEyeSeeThings-
"Never turn a blind eye..."


Sources:
http://www.cnn.com/2012/06/14/world/meast/egypt-ruling/index.html?npt=NP1

Support the Eye on The Internet:

Sign up for swagbucks with this referral and you for every point you earn searching we win matching points. Did we mention that you receive points simply for searching the web? click the picture below to sign up
 

What is Swagbucks?

  
         
 

Tech News: Google's Gawking is getting noticed

Turning the Eye toward Google Streetview

How much does Google Know?

As you can see from the picture to the left, from Google street view, they see a lot and know a lot more. It is to be expected considering they are the most popular search engine in the world. However, when asked the simple question of why their street view mapping cars were collecting unencrypted data off of wireless networks as they pasted by the techs from Google were "clueless".
Picture from google streetview


          The investigation into this then became of "it wasn't my job to check the logs" and "I never really read the design documents". All the buckpassing has raised even more red flags. It appears Google was trying to sweep it under the rug when one of their spokeswomen stated  “Clearly there was a process breakdown.” in referance to the number of engineers working on the project that claimed not to know all the details. Google then pulled out their digital ace in the whole and blamed it on a lone engineer's software malfunction. The F.C.C , the leaders of the investigation, would not have any of that. Detailing in a report on the case that it was not the work of a lone malfunction, and that they would be continuing the investigation. The F.C.C.s progress in their investigation has encouraged European countries such as Britain and Germany to reopen similar cases.

      However Google is now beginning to play nice, cooperating fully with the investigation. Going as far to destroy the information collected in Britain. Google's most resent statement on the matter was that the collection methods did meet its standards but, they haven't broken any laws. The information was never sold, or give to any third party or used to benefit anyone.

       So what do you think? Has Google made an honest mistake, or were they storing information for some dark terrible purpose, or just trying to make money? Leave a comment down below and let us know.

-Remember 

Never turn a blind eye...

Support the Eye on The Internet:

Sign up for swagbucks with this referral and you for every point you earn searching we win matching points. Did we mention that you receive points simply for searching the web? click the picture below to sign up


What is Swagbucks?




Sources:
NY Times:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/13/technology/google-street-view-case-brought-employee-denials.html?_r=1&ref=technology